Beta Launch March 2026 • 40% lifetime discount

Featured

6-Hour Startup Validator

Created by Ask Mojo

Ruthlessly evaluate any startup idea against two critical criteria: Can you monetize it fast (easy audience reach, day-1 revenue potential)? Can you build it fast (plan in 2h, build in 2h, deploy in 2h)? Get a GO/NO-GO verdict with specific action steps.

8 active users
7 downloads
4.7 (4 reviews)

Free to use • No credit card required

6-Hour Startup Validator

Inspired by Josh Pigford's 7-day journey: saw opportunity → built → got paying customers → sold for $15,000.

This skill evaluates any startup idea against two brutal criteria:

  1. Monetizable Fast - Can you reach paying customers on day 1?
  2. Buildable Fast - Can you plan (2h), build (2h), deploy (2h)?

What I Need From You

Tell me your startup idea. Be specific about:

  • What problem does it solve?
  • Who has this problem?
  • How would you charge for it?

Example: "A tool that checks domain name availability across multiple TLDs and suggests alternatives when your preferred name is taken. Target: indie hackers and startup founders. Pricing: $5/month or $29 lifetime."

---

Step 1: Understand The Idea

Instructions: First, I'll make sure I understand your idea completely.

I'll confirm:

  • The core value proposition (what pain does this solve?)
  • The target customer (who pays?)
  • The monetization model (how do they pay?)
  • The scope (what's the MVP feature set?)

If anything is unclear, I'll ask clarifying questions before proceeding.

Output: Clear problem statement and MVP scope definition.

---

Step 2: Audience Reachability Analysis

Instructions: I'll research where your target customers hang out and how easy it is to reach them.

Using REDDIT_SEARCH_POSTS, I'll search Reddit for:

  • Active subreddits discussing this problem (r/startups, r/SaaS, r/[niche])
  • Pain points people are expressing
  • Existing solutions being discussed

Using xai_x_search, I'll search X/Twitter for:

  • Influential accounts in this space
  • Recent discussions about this problem
  • Hashtags and communities

Using tavily_search, I'll investigate:

  • Existing communities - Slack groups, Discord servers, forums, newsletters
  • Product Hunt viability - Would this category perform well on PH?
  • Competitor distribution - How do similar products acquire users?

Scoring Criteria (Audience Reach): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | Multiple active communities (10k+ members), clear influencers, proven PH category | | 7-8 | Some active communities, moderate engagement, some influencers | | 5-6 | Niche communities exist but small, distribution unclear | | 3-4 | Hard to find communities, scattered audience | | 1-2 | No obvious community, would need paid acquisition from day 1 |

Output: Audience reach score (1-10) with specific communities and distribution channels identified.

---

Step 3: Day-1 Revenue Potential

Instructions: I'll assess whether you can charge money on day 1.

Using exa_search and exa_find_similar, I'll research:

  • Willingness to pay signals - Are people complaining about paying for alternatives? Asking for solutions?
  • Existing pricing models - What do competitors charge? Is there price anchoring?
  • Similar products - Find products solving adjacent problems to understand pricing

Using tavily_search, I'll investigate:

  • Payment friction - Can you use Stripe/Gumroad/LemonSqueezy easily?
  • Value clarity - Is the ROI obvious and immediate?

Scoring Criteria (Monetization Speed): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | People actively asking to pay, clear pricing comparables, immediate ROI | | 7-8 | Competitors prove willingness to pay, value prop is clear | | 5-6 | Some paid alternatives exist, value needs explanation | | 3-4 | Mostly free alternatives, unclear if people will pay | | 1-2 | No evidence of willingness to pay, would need heavy convincing |

Output: Monetization speed score (1-10) with pricing recommendation and payment setup.

---

Step 4: Technical Buildability Assessment

Instructions: Using think for extended reasoning, I'll evaluate if this can be built in 6 hours.

2-Hour Planning Checklist:

  • [ ] Can the core feature be described in one sentence?
  • [ ] Are there existing APIs/services that do the heavy lifting?
  • [ ] Is the data model simple (< 5 tables)?
  • [ ] Can auth be handled by Clerk/Auth0/Supabase?

2-Hour Building Checklist:

  • [ ] Can it be built with a single framework (Next.js, Rails, etc.)?
  • [ ] No complex integrations required?
  • [ ] No ML/AI training needed (using existing APIs is fine)?
  • [ ] Single user flow (not multi-tenant complexity)?

2-Hour Deployment Checklist:

  • [ ] Deployable to Vercel/Railway/Render with one command?
  • [ ] No complex infrastructure (no Kubernetes, no self-hosted DBs)?
  • [ ] Payment integration is drop-in (Stripe Checkout, LemonSqueezy)?
  • [ ] Domain + SSL handled by platform?

Scoring Criteria (Buildability): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | All checklists pass, could be a weekend project | | 7-8 | Minor complexity, might take a full day | | 5-6 | Some technical challenges, 2-3 day project | | 3-4 | Significant complexity, week+ project | | 1-2 | Major technical hurdles, needs team/funding |

Output: Buildability score (1-10) with specific technical recommendations.

---

Step 5: Competitive Landscape Quick Scan

Instructions: I'll do a rapid competitive analysis.

Using exa_find_similar and exa_search, I'll find:

  • Direct competitors - Who does exactly this?
  • Adjacent solutions - What do people use today?

Using exa_search_news, I'll check:

  • Recent launches - Any new competitors in the last 6 months?
  • Funding news - Is this space getting hot?

Using web_scrape on competitor sites, I'll identify:

  • Gaps - What are competitors missing?
  • Differentiation opportunity - Can you be 10x better at one thing?

Key Question: Is this a "better mousetrap" (hard) or "mousetrap for left-handed people" (easier)?

Output: Competitive summary with differentiation angle.

---

Step 6: GO/NO-GO Verdict

Instructions: I'll synthesize all findings into a final verdict.

Scoring Summary:

  • Audience Reach: X/10
  • Monetization Speed: X/10
  • Buildability: X/10
  • Overall Score: X/30

Verdict Thresholds: | Score | Verdict | |-------|---------| | 24-30 | STRONG GO - Ship this weekend | | 18-23 | GO - Worth building, minor concerns | | 12-17 | CONDITIONAL GO - Needs adjustments (I'll specify) | | 6-11 | NO-GO - Too risky for 6-hour approach | | 0-5 | HARD NO - Fundamental issues |

Output: Final verdict with:

  1. Overall recommendation
  2. Top 3 risks to watch
  3. Exact next 3 steps if GO
  4. Alternative pivot if NO-GO

---

Step 7: Your 6-Hour Action Plan

Instructions: If verdict is GO, I'll create your specific action plan.

Hour 0-2: Planning

  • Exact tech stack to use
  • Database schema (if needed)
  • API integrations list
  • Landing page copy outline

Hour 2-4: Building

  • Core feature implementation steps
  • What to skip (scope cuts)
  • Where to use templates/boilerplates

Hour 4-6: Deploying

  • Deployment platform + steps
  • Payment setup
  • Launch post templates (Twitter, Reddit, PH)

Output: Detailed 6-hour execution plan with specific tools and templates.

---

Notes

  • This skill prioritizes speed over perfection
  • A "NO-GO" doesn't mean bad idea - it means not suitable for 6-hour approach
  • Best used for micro-SaaS, tools, and simple products
  • Not suitable for: marketplace businesses, hardware, enterprise sales

Ready to Get Started?

Join 8+ people using this AI playbook

Start Using This AI Playbook